Hi, I'm trying to use the NER option and will appreciate any help given,

Hi,

I'm ussing the FreeLing 4.0 for the galician language.

If we analyze the sentence:

Cando varrín contigo, xa varrera a escaleira e varría durmido

we observe that there is no explanation for the second M in the tag for the varrera verb.

6 varrera varrer VMIM1S0 VMI pos=verb|type=main|mood=indicative|person=1|num=singular - - - - - - -

What is Semantic graph what is all about when i am using online Demostration version we find the last feature is semantic graph i would like to know what is really semantic graph.

we know that there are many option for analysis like Morphology analysis, pos tagging, shallow parsing, full parsing, dependency parsing, coreference, and semantic graph

Hi,

I noticed that there are differences between the documentation of the tagset module and the implementation. I'm using the perl bindings and the released 4.0 sources.

For example, instead of get_msf_string, the method name available seems to be get_msd_string.

Hello,

We have just upgraded from Freeling 3.1 to 4.0. We want to use the semantic graph, so we have changed de dependecy Anaylyzer used, from Txala to a mixed depTxala-Treeler analysis (as the example java file shows).
Is this change mandatory to use semantic graph and dependency analysis?
What do we improve with the annexed change?

// depTxala.analyze( doc ); //3.1

depTxala.completeParseTree(doc); //4.0
depTreeler.analyze(doc); //4.0

Hello,

When I process the results of the analysis that Freeling has made, the JVM I run crashes and dies.
The trace says that the error is in the native Freeling library:
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=0x19ea4fd3, pid=10300, tid=9224
#
# JRE version: 6.0_45-b06
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (20.45-b01 mixed mode windows-x86 )
# Problematic frame:
# C [libfreeling.dll+0xb4fd3]

i am using windows 10 and how can we run freeling using cygwin in windows platform

Hello,

I have a problem with how FreeLing determines the function of some words. Sometimes the PoS and the determined syntactic function is not correct.

Hello!

I am using Freeling to parse sentences, to get its dependency tree, syntactic function of each node, and the lemma of each word.
I use version 3.1 of Freeling, from a java program (via your native interface compiled with Swig). The language I use is Spanish.

We can see the new features of FreeLing 4 here:
http://nlp.lsi.upc.edu/freeling/node/27

But is there any other significant changes in specifications of FreeLing 3 and 4? Can we use FreeLing 4 as a drop in replacement for FreeLing 3?

Many Thanks,